Investing Delivery Volume Marketwatch

Delivery volume percentage on the Kite marketwatch

From WebNotes, a public knowledge base. Last updated . Reading time ~4 min.

Delivery volume percentage on a Kite marketwatch scrip row is the share of total day’s volume that resulted in actual delivery to demat accounts, expressed as a percentage. It distinguishes delivery (CNC) trades that result in demat credit from intraday (MIS) trades that are squared off the same day.

How the metric is defined

For any equity scrip on a given trading day, NSE and BSE report:

  • Total traded quantity. The aggregate of all buy and sell trades, divided by 2.
  • Deliverable quantity. The subset where the buyer chose CNC (carry to demat) and the seller delivered from holdings.

Delivery volume percentage = (Deliverable quantity / Total traded quantity) x 100.

The figure is published by the exchange end-of-day, typically by T+1 morning. Kite displays it on the marketwatch and the quote screen.

Where the metric appears on Kite

SurfaceWhere it shows
Kite webMarket depth panel, in the surrounding metrics
Kite mobile appQuote screen, alongside volume and OHLC
ConsoleHistorical delivery percentage per scrip

Reading the metric

Delivery percentage rangeTypical interpretation
Above 50%Strong investor interest; most buyers carrying to demat
30% to 50%Mixed activity; roughly balanced between investors and intraday traders
10% to 30%Intraday-dominant; futures traders dominate the tape
Below 10%Speculative interest; little long-term conviction

These are heuristics, not rules. A breakout day on a large-cap can show 15% delivery (intraday traders piling in); a quiet day on a midcap can show 70% delivery (no intraday interest, just slow investor accumulation).

Why it matters

Signal of conviction

A sustained increase in delivery percentage on a rising stock often precedes a fundamental rerating. Investors are carrying positions rather than booking out; this is bullish on a 6-12 month horizon.

A sustained decrease in delivery percentage on a falling stock suggests the falls are intraday-driven (margin squeeze, futures unwind) rather than fundamental dumping.

Mispricing detection

A scrip with high volume but very low delivery percentage may be in a speculative bubble. Conversely, low-volume scrips with high delivery percentage may be quietly accumulated by long-only investors.

Index inclusion

NSE and BSE consider delivery volume in their index inclusion methodology. A scrip with persistently low delivery percentage is less likely to be included in flagship indices (Nifty 50, Sensex, Nifty Next 50).

How Kite calculates the displayed figure

Kite reads the NSE / BSE bhav copy at end-of-day and surfaces the delivery percentage on the marketwatch for T+1. The figure on Kite is the exchange-reported figure, not a Kite-computed estimate.

Intraday, the delivery percentage shown on Kite is the previous trading day’s figure (T-1), because the current day’s delivery is unknown until end-of-day settlement.

Limitations

  • F&O contracts have no delivery percentage. Futures and options are cash-settled (with the exception of physically-settled stock derivatives on expiry); the concept does not apply.
  • ETFs may show low delivery percentage. Authorised participants frequently create / redeem units via the in-kind mechanism, which can lower reported delivery.
  • Pre-open contributions excluded. The metric reflects normal-session trades.
  • MF schemes do not have delivery percentage. The concept is specific to listed equity.

See also

External references

References

  1. NSE India, Daily bhav copy and security-wise delivery data, nseindia.com.
  2. BSE India, Equity bhav copy, bseindia.com.
  3. Zerodha Support, Delivery percentage on the marketwatch, support.zerodha.com.

Reviewed and published by

The WebNotes Editorial Team covers Indian capital markets, payments infrastructure and retail investor procedures. Every article is fact-checked against primary sources, principally SEBI circulars and master directions, NPCI specifications and the official support documentation published by the intermediary in question. Drafts go through a second-pair-of-eyes review and a separate compliance read before publication, and revisions are tracked against the SEBI and NPCI rule changes referenced in the methodology section.

Last reviewed
Conflicts of interest
WebNotes is independent. No relationship with any broker, registrar or bank named in this article.