How-to
scheme comparison
MF analysis
How to compare two mutual fund schemes
Comparing two MF schemes requires multi-axis analysis. Single-axis comparison (1-year return) leads to poor decisions. Discipline: choose one; don’t hold both.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure. This guide is published by WebNotes Editorial Team for informational purposes. WebNotes has no commercial relationship with any AMC or platform. No affiliate commission is earned.
Step-by-step procedure
See the procedure infobox above for the seven steps.
Comparison matrix template
| Axis | Scheme A | Scheme B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category match | ✓ | ✓ | Tie |
| 5-year CAGR vs benchmark | +200 bps | +150 bps | A |
| 7-year CAGR vs benchmark | +250 bps | +100 bps | A |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | A |
| Max drawdown | -38% | -35% | B |
| Direct TER | 0.80% | 1.10% | A |
| Manager tenure | 8 years | 3 years | A |
| AUM | 12,000 cr | 2,500 cr | Either |
| Portfolio overlap | - | - | - |
| Overall | - | - | A |
See also
- How to read MF factsheet
- How to read scheme information document
- How to read MF portfolio disclosure
- How to read MF expense disclosure
- How to read MF benchmark comparison
- How to compute risk-adjusted return
- How to evaluate fund manager track record
- How to read MF riskometer
- How to read MF stress test disclosure
- How to select large-cap fund
- How to select flexicap fund
- How to select mid-cap fund
- How to select ELSS fund
- How to select hybrid fund
- How to build balanced portfolio MF
- Sharpe ratio
- Sortino ratio
- Maximum drawdown
- Calmar ratio
- Total expense ratio (MF)
- SEBI MF categorisation (October 2017)
- Mutual funds in India
- AMFI
- SEBI
External references
References
- SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996.
- SEBI Categorisation Circular, October 2017.
- AMFI Best Practice Guidelines.