<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Downside Risk on WebNotes</title><link>https://v2.webnotes.in/tags/downside-risk/</link><description>Recent content in Downside Risk on WebNotes</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IN</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://v2.webnotes.in/tags/downside-risk/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Sortino ratio in mutual fund performance</title><link>https://v2.webnotes.in/sortino-ratio/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://v2.webnotes.in/sortino-ratio/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;strong&gt;Sortino ratio&lt;/strong&gt; is a risk-adjusted return measure that computes excess return per unit of downside deviation (volatility of negative returns only), rather than total volatility as in the &lt;a href="https://v2.webnotes.in/sharpe-ratio/"&gt;Sharpe ratio&lt;/a&gt;
. The Sortino ratio is more intuitive for most investors because it penalises only &amp;ldquo;bad&amp;rdquo; volatility (drawdowns) and not &amp;ldquo;good&amp;rdquo; volatility (upside).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="formula"&gt;Formula&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sortino ratio = (Scheme return - Risk-free return) / Downside deviation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Downside deviation&lt;/strong&gt;: Standard deviation of only negative returns (or returns below a target threshold).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The downside deviation captures only the &amp;ldquo;loss volatility&amp;rdquo;, aligning with investor intuition that risk = potential loss.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Downside capture ratio in mutual funds</title><link>https://v2.webnotes.in/downside-capture-ratio-mutual-fund/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://v2.webnotes.in/downside-capture-ratio-mutual-fund/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The downside capture ratio&lt;/strong&gt; measures how much of a benchmark index&amp;rsquo;s negative return a mutual fund captures when the benchmark posts a loss. It is computed as the ratio of the fund&amp;rsquo;s average return during periods when the benchmark is negative, to the benchmark&amp;rsquo;s average return during those same periods, expressed as a percentage. A ratio below 100 means the fund falls less than the benchmark in down periods, an indicator of downside protection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Maximum drawdown in mutual funds</title><link>https://v2.webnotes.in/max-drawdown-mutual-fund/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://v2.webnotes.in/max-drawdown-mutual-fund/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maximum drawdown (MDD)&lt;/strong&gt; is the maximum observed loss from a peak NAV to a subsequent trough NAV, before a new peak is achieved, over a specified period. It represents the worst-case scenario for an investor who happened to invest at the highest point and exited at the lowest point in the measurement window. Maximum drawdown is expressed as a negative percentage and is one of the most intuitive and investor-relevant risk metrics, unlike standard deviation, it directly answers the question: &amp;ldquo;What is the worst I could have lost?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Sortino ratio in mutual funds</title><link>https://v2.webnotes.in/sortino-ratio-mutual-fund/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://v2.webnotes.in/sortino-ratio-mutual-fund/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Sortino ratio&lt;/strong&gt; is a risk-adjusted performance measure that refines the &lt;a href="https://v2.webnotes.in/sharpe-ratio-mutual-fund"&gt;Sharpe ratio&lt;/a&gt;
 by substituting total standard deviation with downside deviation, a measure computed only from returns that fall below a minimum acceptable return (MAR), typically the risk-free rate or zero. The intuition is straightforward: investors are harmed by downside volatility but benefit from upside volatility, so penalising both equally (as the Sharpe ratio does) misrepresents the true cost of risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>