Investing tracking error passive funds

Tracking error and tracking difference in passive funds

From WebNotes, a public knowledge base. Last updated . Reading time ~5 min.

Tracking error measures the volatility of a passive fund’s return deviation from its benchmark index, while tracking difference measures the average return deviation. Both are key quality metrics for index funds and ETFs .

Formulas

  • Tracking difference = Average (Scheme return - Benchmark return) over period.
  • Tracking error = Standard deviation of (Scheme return - Benchmark return) over period.

Both are typically expressed as annualised percentages.

Typical ranges

For well-run Indian passive funds:

ProductTracking ErrorTracking Difference
Nifty 50 Index Fund0.05-0.30%-0.10 to -0.40% (negative due to TER)
Nifty 50 ETF0.02-0.15%-0.05 to -0.20%
Mid-cap index fund0.10-0.50%-0.20 to -0.50%
Bharat Bond ETF0.05-0.20%Near zero (low TER)
International funds0.30-1.50%Variable

Causes of tracking error

  • TER: Reduces fund NAV growth versus index.
  • Cash drag: Small cash holdings reduce equity exposure.
  • Rebalancing timing: Lag between index rebalance and fund rebalance.
  • Securities lending revenue: Can offset some costs.
  • Withholding tax on dividends: For international index funds.

Interpretation

For investors choosing index funds or ETFs:

  • Lower tracking error is better: Indicates better index replication.
  • Lower (more negative) tracking difference: Less return drag versus benchmark.
  • Compare same-index products: Choose lower-tracking-error variant.

Use in fund evaluation

For Nifty 50 Index Funds , check:

  • Tracking error: How consistently the fund follows the index.
  • Tracking difference: How much return is given up vs index.
  • TER: The main cost component affecting tracking difference.

A fund with TER 0.30% and tracking difference -0.35% is performing well (tracking difference close to TER).

A fund with TER 0.30% but tracking difference -1.0% has additional friction (operational issues).

See also

External references

References

  1. CFA Institute curriculum on tracking error.
  2. AMFI passive-fund guidelines.

Reviewed and published by

The WebNotes Editorial Team covers Indian capital markets, payments infrastructure and retail investor procedures. Every article is fact-checked against primary sources, principally SEBI circulars and master directions, NPCI specifications and the official support documentation published by the intermediary in question. Drafts go through a second-pair-of-eyes review and a separate compliance read before publication, and revisions are tracked against the SEBI and NPCI rule changes referenced in the methodology section.

Last reviewed
Conflicts of interest
WebNotes is independent. No relationship with any broker, registrar or bank named in this article.